Occupancy permits issued? Time to Pony up.
This article in La Prensa brings up an issue that buyers are now experiencing with new condo buildings in Panama. When contracts are signed they usually have a clause that calls for the final payment within a certain time of issuance of the occupancy permit. As the article points out, city engineers will give occupancy permits when the building has met criteria that don't necessarily allow you to live in the building. In most countries, occupancy means just that, electric, elevators, water, and for the most part construction over.
Like most matters of this kind in Panama, buyers learn the hard way that the short sighted developers want to get paid ASAP to pay off their loans and will enforce a contract on a partially complete building. in order to do it. Unfortunately, many of the developers have not been developers before the boom began so their reputations don't matter to them now that the boom is over. But it leaves another black mark on Panama and the fault must be laid on the government and various engineering organizations that allow this practice.
ANA TERESA BENJAMÍN ANA TERESA BENJAMÍN
abenjamin@prensa.com abenjamin@prensa.com
The engineer of the municipal district of Panama, Jaime Salas, was surprised, surprised that, almost at the end of his administration, proliferation of complaints from buyers who claim to feel deceived because they received apartments in buildings that are not completed.
"If we do affects someone by law, we must resort to the appropriate bodies," defends Chambers, who says that in Municipal Engineering occupancy permits are granted with a minimum of 90% of the work is built because the only way to verify the operation of security systems.
"There is no way to verify if the security there is no electricity, power companies and energy connected only if there is an occupancy permit," Salas details.
That is what the resolution of the AN-411 Authority of Public Services, on "delivery system".
Chambers said that the 10% end up in the works are usually completed in social areas: repellos or ceilings, for example.
But what it does not say is that works without electricity since the beginning of construction, a temporary facility with which you can verify security systems, says the architect Mario Montenegro.
The architect also acknowledged that the granting of the permit with 90% of the finished work is more a practical than a law.
"What we're doing is an arbitrary Engineering," says a buyer who moved into his apartment in September 2008 in a building permit obtained in July of that year, and who complains that he still lives "in a building with dust and construction trucks. The buyer asked the subject to its name because the developer is now going to finish the social areas.
Why does this happen? As explained in Montenegro, "the developer needs to occupy the apartment to begin repaying the loan to the bank construction [and pay less interest], and the consumer has trouble moving. . In the end the consumer is harmed because it affects you then go to have accepted the apartment in an unfinished building. "
For the director of Consumer Protection, Elias Elias, the solution to this dilemma is simple: "There is a provision requiring the consumer to accept a property under conditions other than those agreed, if this happens, you should not accept and should exercise legal action. "
Based on an article in today's La Prensa, the public may be protected from damages inflicted by construction companies. A number of private residences have been damaged by falling debris in the last few years. With no laws to protect them they had little or no recourse except to file a law suite. In Panama, that is expensive and takes years. With the high probability of corruption you would probably lose the case in the end. Here is a move in the right direction.
Recent Comments