Panama has long held the position that the labor market is reserved for Panamanians and have made it difficult for foreign immigrants to have the opportunity to work in the country. This is especially true in the professional trades such as doctors, lawyers, educators etc. I know of a Panamanian doctor who lived in the U.S. for many years and is highly regarded worldwide in his field who can't practice in Panama until he goes through two years of local residency. It is roadblocks like these that hold Panama back from becoming a greater country. Local talent is scarce in many fields and foreigners who have these skills are not allowed to enter. It is a misguided protectionist position that keeps Panamanians from gaining the knowledge and skills that are so desperately needed in the country. In addition to this, Panamanians who leave the country for higher education in many cases do not return to their country, compounding the problem. This fact was highlighted at a recent conference here in Panama.
La Prensa
The United Nations Organization on
human development presented a report yesterday on a recent study on immigration.
The 108 room convention center in the City of Knowledge was full. The guests came to hear the details of the latest report on Human Development United Nations Program for Development (UNDP), devoted to migration.
At that moment, and as a preamble to the study conducted in 182 countries, the group was part of an exercise with which Jose Eguren, UNDP representative in Panama, seeking to show that, at some point, all human beings are migrants.
The result: slightly less than half raised their hands.
Then Eguren asked to raise their hands who were born inside the country and moved to the capital city. The other half raised his hand.
The result of this simple exercise was a tiny sample of the nearly one million migrants in the world. What is surprising to the researchers conducting the study is that 740 million people move within their own country and the rest across the border. A phenomenon that countries do not escape with a good index of human development.
Francisco Rodriguez, co-author of the paper and chief of investigations for the Office of Human Development Report, said that countries with higher per capita incomes obviously offer greater opportunities for mobilizing people. This represents, he said, an inequality for the inhabitants of the least developed and low income.
Rodriguez explained that immigration Panama represents 3% of the population, while emigration, 6%.
The expert, who was responsible for presenting the report in Panama, said that it requires an immigration policy with fewer barriers.
According to Rodriguez, it is clear that the more imposing barriers to migration also increase the problems of illegal human trafficking, which ultimately blends with the crime.
"Being able to decide where to live is a key element of human freedom" notes the report.
As this is a global report, Rodriguez considered essential that each regional office of UNDP country extrapolates the information where it operates.
I am certainly glad to see this article about easing visa restrictions. This is a major complaint I hear from investors, many of whom become frustrated with the system and give up. Panama need to protect its borders and control who comes in the country. But they also must move quickly to make entry available to those who will help bring prosperity to the nation.
One of the things I like about Panama is the relatively small population of a little over 3.3 million. This rather small population is one of the reasons you don't see such blatant poverty that can be seen throughout most of Central American and Caribbean countries. Costa Rica is the only other country in the area that has been blessed with a rather small population and a manageable growth rate of about 1.3%. That is not to say there is no poverty here. But, even with the reported 40% living below the poverty level you don't see much of it because most are living in the interior on plots of land that provide a subsistence living. Panama also has a large indigenous population who for the most part live in that 40% poverty level and they tend to live in reservations or groups away from populated areas. Of course a city like Panama City which has nearly half of the countries population also has a lot more concentrated poverty, especially on the Colon side of the corridor.
Being the number one issue of complaint is not because it is the first thing that must be done in order to take advantage of the benefits Panama has to offer. I receive more complaints about this one subject than all others combined, year after year. And they are usually the most passionate, because when it comes to having the right to reside where you have spent money, people naturally become feisty. I am sure this article will bring many such comments and they are welcome. This problem has gone on for years, but in the last few years delays in immigration have reached a point where many foreigners just give up and take a pass on Panama. Part of this problem is the fact that more people than ever are trying to get residency and the government is ill equipped to handle it. Millions of dollars of new facility and equipment that were purchased to alleviate the problem are still not operating, and with a new administration coming into office they will have to learn the ropes which will no doubt cause further delays. And it does not seem to matter if you are an investor with 20 million dollars or a Costa Rican who married a Panamanian trying to get residency, plan on a long wait to get that all important document.
Recent Comments